 |
|
Citation Format [Vol.] PGH. J. Tech. L. & Pol'y [Art. #]Contact Information Colleen Taylor, Editor-in-ChiefRobert Salera, Executive EditorTimothy DeHaut, Executive EditorJournal of Technology Law & Policy
|
Welcome to Pitt Law JTLP!The Journal of Technology Law & Policy is one of the nation's most distinguished scholarly publications. It is a student-run journal at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and publishes twice every academic year. In addition, JLTP members work tirelessly to keep practitioners, judges, academics, and policymakers in the know by producing journal notes that cover subject matter where there is little scholarly commentary as well as shorter articles on cutting-edge issues.
Volume VIII - Spring 2008Would You Like That iPhone Locked or Unlocked?: Reconciling Apple’s Anticircumvention Measures With the DMCADaniel J. Corbett University of Pittsburgh School of Law
International E-Discovery: Navigating the MazeErica M. Davila Rutgers School of Law
Price Fix Away?: Does the Supreme Court's Decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Strengthen the Ability of Businesses to Engage in Vertical Price Restraints with Impunity?Erick S. Lee The George Washington University Law School
Scare of Avian Flu Revisits India: A Bumpy Road AheadRajnish Kumar Rai Senior police officer of the Indian Police Service
Front Matter for JTLP VIII - Spring 2008
Volume VIII - Fall 2007Mineshafts on Treasure Island: A Relief Map of the eBay Fraud LandscapeMary M. Calkins: Attorney, Foley & Lardner LLP; J.D./ M.B.A. Alexei Nikitkov: Assistant Professor of Accounting, Brock University; Ph.D. Vernon Richardson: S. Robson Walton Chair of Accounting, Univ. of Arkansas; Ph.D.
A Tangled Web We Weave: Enforcing International Speech Restrictions in an Online WorldGregory S. Cooper, J.D. University of Pennsylvania Law School The Communications Decency Act of 1996: Why § 230 is Outdated and Publisher Liability for Defamation Should be Reinstated Against Internet Service ProvidersMatthew G. Jeweler University of Maryland School of Law
The Future of Cameras in the Courts: Florida Sunshine or Judge JudyElizabeth A. Stawicki, J.D. St. Thomas in Minneapolis Front Matter for JTLP VIII - Fall 2007 RSS
CURRENTS, Featured Articles on Pressing IssuesCURRENTS is a regularly updated resource of short, member-authored pieces that discuss a novel issue in technology law, providing analysis and research direction. CURRENTS is a supplement to the regular publishing of JTLP that occurs each law school semester. If you are interested in being a guest writer for CURRENTS, please contact Colleen Taylor, Editor-in-Chief.
RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION: IS THE RISK WORTH THE REWARD? 04/03/2008
“First-to-Invent” Versus “First-to-File”: Which Patent System is Best for the U.S.? by Stephen DiLorenzo 02/21/2008 The United States is the only country in the world which still awards patents under a “first-to-invent,” rather than under a “first-to-file” system. If identical bills S.1145 and H.R.1908, both titled “Patent Reform Act of 2007,” are passed into law, the “first-to-invent” patent system will officially become extinct. One of the main provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 modifies 35 U.S.C §102 and converts the United States patent regime to a “first-to-file” system. Opponents of the “first-to-file” system argue that “[t]he first to invent principle is the jewel in the crown of [the U.S.] system. It is based on ultimate and unequivocal fairness.” While proponents of the change argue instead that “the U.S. first-to-invent system[] ‘yields results that are inherently unstable and unpredictable.’" (footnotes omitted) ...more
|
